Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

[REBOL] Re: make/deep functionality?

From: robert:muench:robertmuench at: 15-Jan-2003 20:38

> -----Original Message----- > From: [rebol-bounce--rebol--com] [mailto:[rebol-bounce--rebol--com]] > On Behalf Of Joel Neely > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 6:17 PM > To: [rebol-list--rebol--com] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: make/deep functionality? > I understand your frustration, but at least REBOL lets you > build the variation you want!
Hi, ;-) I just have done to much C++ programming where "construction is initialization" is a law... And I know that Rebol offers me the variation. But this is stuff I don't want to think about ;-)).
> I understand that in your example there's some extra typing > required, but at least you get the *choice* of controlling > when you have or do not have sharing; you can easily define > your own object factory to provide a totally unique instance > on each evaluation as: > ...
Thanks for the code :-)). I will add it to my personal library. Robert