[REBOL] Re: Why not forget about AltMe and Rebolist and use RebolTalk instead???
From: hallvard:ystad-oops:as:no at: 5-Jan-2005 21:12
... and then there are the google forums (don't remeber what they're called). They function
both as a ML and as a forum, i.e. one can post both on the website and via email. The
very little use some of us made of this one week ago was very successful, in my opinion.
(But then again, the ML would be out of RT's hands...)
Dixit Carlos Lorenz (20.00 05.01.2005):
>Carl and others
>First I'd like to apologize for saying in my last message to the list
>that AltME is not stable. It seems now things were cleared with the
>news that the Linux HD crashed and not AltME.
>Second I would like to say that its very important that though we are
>a community as you said that RT take a position about the use of a
>Forum since ML is a quite dead thing due to all problems you
>So why not consider the use of Vanilla? It has a pretty nice
>navigation. It is written in REBOL and it can be "googled"
>On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:27:51 -0800, carl-rebol.net <carl-rebol.net> wrote:
>> This is a very good question, and I'm glad you ask it. I have also been thinking a
lot about it over the last year.
>> First, in defense of AltME: it DID NOT crash. The Linux hard disk crashed. AltME
is an extremely stable and trustworthy product, even as a 1.0 product.
>> AltME is great for PRIVATE discussions, but what we want to see (and what new users
want to read) are PUBLIC discussions.
>> Please read my public statement about this topic on http://www.rebol.net/cgi-bin/blog.r?view=0089
>> Then, let's figure out a solution and make it happen! Maybe its REBOL Talk, maybe
not. I don't know. This is a community. We need to decide this together.