Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Sending e-mail using non-default server

From: tim:johnsons-web at: 18-Nov-2001 16:20

On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 03:29:26PM -0800, [holger--rebol--com] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:47:42AM +1100, Greg Schwarz wrote: > > Jon, > > One big problem you will have, many ISP's will not let you relay mail via > > different smtp server. This is to stop spam mailers. Most ISP's you dial > > into will only allow you to use their smtp server. > > Usually it is the other way around. The ISP you dial into does > not care which SMTP server you use, but the SMTP server you connect > to will only accept your email if it either recognizes you as a valid > sender from the same domain as the server, or if the server is > responsible for accepting email to the recipient of your email.
I stand corrected. As always, I'm learning a lot from Holger. :>)
> What this means is that you can usually either use the SMTP server of > your ISP or the SMTP server the email eventually has to be sent to (as > determined by DNS-MX), but not any other, arbitrary SMTP server. > > For ISPs to physically block outgoing SMTP traffic to non-local SMTP > servers is relatively rare, because it breaks a lot of default Unix > setups that run sendmail without a "smarterhost" entry. A lot of > ISPs actually prefer you to run sendmail without "smarterhost", i.e. > to connect directly to the destination SMTP server instead of going > through the ISP's server, because this reduces the load on the ISP's > server, in particular if you run and expand mailing lists. > > -- > Holger Kruse > [holger--rebol--com] > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to > [rebol-request--rebol--com] with "unsubscribe" in the > subject, without the quotes.
-- Tim Johnson <[tim--johnsons-web--com]>