[REBOL] Re: fighting spam paper & links / naive bayes /anybody ?
From: al:bri:xtra at: 11-Sep-2002 17:03
Graham wrote:
> > I can't imagine why spam would be encrypted ... after all they want you
to read it!
Carl wrote:
> He's got a point Andrew. (:
:)
When I look at the headers and content of the spam email as plain text, it
seems to be gibberish (may be url-encoded?). When viewing through my email
client, the client "un-decodes" and displays the colourful content of the
spam. I've been deleting the horrible ones (you don't want to know) and
haven't got any examples yet.
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169 http://valley.150m.com/
