[REBOL] Re: Perl is to stupid to understand this 1 liner.
From: carl:cybercraft at: 18-Dec-2001 22:55
On 18-Dec-01, Andrew Martin wrote:
> Reichart wrote:
>> 1. Q: CARL WROTE: Perhaps, instead of trying to make software
>> understand documents written any old which way by humans, we should
>> create strictly formal versions of current human languages that can
>> be tested for correctness by computer? We'd then be able to have
>> documents that could be
>> examined by computer without the need to worry about an infinate
>> number of special cases.
> Hmmmmm. I thought the answer is Rebol! :-)
Like to write the English dialect Andrew? (: