[REBOL] Re: Forum Name
From: ptretter:charter at: 6-Jan-2004 10:57
Yeah I agree. I wouldn't want to fracture the community much more at this
point. I do think Altme serves a great purpose. Problem is that we need a
place where quick access to answers can be provided. The more scattered the
mediums that attempt to gain our rebol attention the more chances that we
wont get that perk that having a narrow resource pool gives us. So if
anything, we probably need to have more marketing and inclusion for the
Altme REBOL world instead. And at some time in the fuure its my hope that
after REBOL-VIEW world has completed its task it will be accessible somehow
from the REBOL world.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch" <[maximo--meteorstudios--com]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:47 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Forum Name
> I prefer rebolforum
> it IS a rebol forum so its the most direct name you can give it.
> The problem I see with the forum Idea is that Carl S. promotes altMe en
masse and the vast majority of rebolers accept Carl's views as the default
pattern thinking for anything rebol.
> trying to virge the community to a new communication channel, will only
further split the exchange of information. There is already a (vast?) gap
in altme and mailing list information.
> Sometimes, its obvious that the premium information is being discussed on
> I (and many others like me) just don't have time to start following 2-3-4
different communication threads each day. I think that is why the previous
forum failed (combined with the number of rebolers there are).