[REBOL] Re: Fibonaccio - Was: Report on WinCE Rebol --- Speed Comparison
From: dness:home at: 29-Jun-2001 9:22
Bard Papegaaij wrote:
> I understand completely. It was just that I saw you using the fib function,
> thought it would be nice to share my attempts at coding the same function
> a number of different 'solutions' for some of the problems posed by that
> recursive definition (speed, inability to calculate higher than fib 42,
> stack overflow).
> Sorry if I have thrown you off track by 'hi-jacking' your thread for
> something like
> this. It won't happen again I ('m not sure I can) promise ;-).
No problem. I figure the thread is `ours' not `mine'. I just wanted
to make sure it was clear I wasn't making any claims for it being
a `good' fibonacci evaluatior.
And `analysis' is always interesting when you can do it in any