[REBOL] Re: oss revisited (briefly!)
From: robert:muench:robertmuench at: 10-Feb-2004 12:30
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:36:10 -0900, Tim Johnson <[tim--johnsons-web--com]>
wrote:
> It is not just possible, but is probable, that a 'tipping point'
> will be reached that will cause a sharp spike in increased linux
> use. If there is not an 'open source' rebol, rebol will lose out.
Hi, I never undestand what the problem is? What's the problem with Rebol
not being open-source? It doesn't cost hundred-of-thousands of $s to use.
So if you are doing things that will create revenue, you can afford a
license, if not use the free interpreter.
If we would talk about Oracle database systems here, I would agree to do
cost-cutting.
But, all those open-source demagogues, if you can show-up with a
business-model that let RT make some money from their work, I will be
quite but otherwise it's just a techie POV with no business know-how
behind it.
And, BTW: Those not caring about Rebol because not being open-source have
a problem ;-)
> Note: this is my opinion, and I don't wish to be involved in
> or initiate an 'OS war'.
Well, why not? If someone can tell me a really benefit Rebol being
open-source I might change my POV. Sorry, if this sound a bit harsh here,
but only moaning without showing a solution is not that professional.
--
Robert M. M=FCnch
Management & IT Freelancer
Mobile: +49 (177) 245 2802
http://www.robertmuench.de
