Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Fw: REBOL/View/Pro licensing

From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 15-Sep-2001 18:47

----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Tretter" <[ptretter--charter--net]> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 5:07 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Fw: REBOL/View/Pro licensing
> I agree. I just want ENCAP and would be happy! However, the /Pro
> in my opinion is almost useless.
I think, that most ppl here will feel the same. Now we have to deal with RT ability to hear our voices. As you can see, RT's website is silently being updated on several places: As you can see, Rebol products page is new too. Express reference page contained some little bit updated info as of August 23. But alarm my friends - soud capabilities are once again mentioned in regard to View/Pro product. So - the question is - is it RT's decision to let it be that way, or new product page is quick hack, so noone properly looked at its content? Well, later on - I got to following page, so it seems sound is really going to be freed? (btw: what is "block translator", and "anonymous functions (lambda)"? :-) RT's product policy, licensing schemes change so often, that many of us probably feel unstable about Rebol. RT now has new marketing manager in charge - Scot M. Sutherland, so let's hope we will get licensing schemes suitable for all of us. Currently however, the only one "channel" to rebol programmers, users, is this ml. While RT claims they listen to us, I can bet they will get things out without asking us for our opinions, so let's just hope we will not see folks here leave their rebol related projects, because of unsuitable licensing terms ... -pekr-