Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search


From: g:santilli:tiscalinet:it at: 23-Jan-2003 17:14

Hi Ladislav, On Thursday, January 23, 2003, 1:54:05 PM, you wrote: LM> Our different POV's seem to be mainly a terminological difference. After Yes, indeed. I should have said: the "out of range series" error should not exist. (I.e. out of range series can exist, but they should not produce an error, but rather should be corrected.) LM> a: [1 2 3] ; == [1 2 3] LM> b: tail a ; == [] LM> clear a ; == [] LM> ; b is out-of-range now LM> append a [4 5 6] LM> ; b is "in range" again LM> I would not expect the interpreter to prevent B from being temporarily LM> out-of-range in this case, because it really might mean "too much work". I agree. Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> -- REBOL Programmer Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: