[REBOL] Re: SVG dialect project
From: gchiu::compkarori::co::nz at: 28-Apr-2003 8:55
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:42:41 +0200
"Robert M. Muench" <[robert--muench--robertmuench--de]>
wrote:
>Hi, I just want to ask a question about something that I
>don't
>understand since a long time now. We have make-doc from
>RT, we have ML
>from Andrew, we have make-doc from Chris and finally we
>have
>make-doc-pro done by me.
>
>This doesn't look like a good product management to me. I
>might be
>wrong, but why do we have so many forked projects? What's
>the benefit of
The forking is necessary. RT have not released MD 2.0
source yet. Chris' version removes the irrelevant parts
for CGI use, and adds XHTML compliance. He is now looking
at adding SVG dialect support instead of the currently
supported View dialect. It may be that we have a dialect
mechanism to support a number of dialects as plug ins.
Your MDP is constrained by your copyright.
Andrew's ML is an XML dialect ( I got it wrong before ).
>times already) is fragmentation of everything. Docs are
>fragmented,
>discussion is fragmented (ML, IOS servers, AltME worlds,
>you name it),
That's life. People have different requirements.
But the REP project is an attempt at unification -- to
summarise activity on all these discussion groups.
Anyway, that's all IMHO
--
Graham Chiu
http://www.compkarori.com/vanilla
Rebol Encyclopaedia Project
