[REBOL] Re: dot reb <=> dot net (was .reb)
From: m:koopmans2:chello:nl at: 18-Aug-2001 22:12
The problem to me always seems that most things are already done,
so you can only try to improve on that. For example Groove.
A P2P db system could be ground-breaking, I think. With Rugby
the essential middleware is there to move things around, so it is only
-a matter of a bootstrap presence provider
-an intelligent way to store and move information.
The obvious drawback in a pure P2P DB system is that you may loose
information when nodes go down. If you do a thing like Groove or Freenet
it then that's OK.
The other thing I'd like to do is pure Dot Reb:
- Federated Rugby services a la SOAP / UDDI, but now easy
- RIDE: The Rebol IDE
Think of what you can related to all that grid distributed computing stuff!
As for XML, somebody out here did some improved tools for parsing (?)