[REBOL] Re: Telnet protocol scheme weirdness.
From: bga:bug-br at: 3-Feb-2004 18:55
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:06:23 +0100, Gabriele Santilli <
[g--santilli--tiscalinet--it]> said:
> BGA> The end result is that the above line will send #{1B4F420D0A} to
> the
> BGA> server instead of what I wanted it to (#{1B4F42}). I already
> tried to
> BGA> change the open line to:
>
> I guess it is opening the sub-port in /LINES mode.
Maybe, but I am not finding where it is actually opening it in the
scheme code. I did try get-modes on the port and sub-port to determine
its flags and both had "binary" and "direct" set to true.
> BGA> port/state/flags: port/state/flags or
> BGA> system/standard/port-flags/direct
> BGA> or 32 or 2051; No-Wait, BINARY (51) (2048)
> BGA> port/sub-port/state/flags: port/sub-port/state/flags or 2051 or
> 32
>
> BTW, should use SET-MODES here actually, AFAIK changing the flags
> directly is deprecated.
Will change that but I don't think it will help with my problem.
Thanks!
-Bruno
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
We may not return the affection of those who like us, but we always
respect their good judgement.<