[REBOL] Rebol Tech, please answer. Two questions. Re:(2)
From: t_degrav:rhrk:uni-kl at: 12-Sep-2000 12:33
Hi Elan,
just a small observation
[rebol--techscribe--com] wrote:
> To emphasize this pattern aspect, let's invent a new skip function,
> skip-one:
...
> skip-one blk
Maybe skip-one isn't the best choice of name here because
skip-one blk and
skip one blk do at least _look_ very similar, but the second line is
actually what you were argumenting against... ;-)
By the way, your explanation is very reasonable and I won't say anything
against it, but Keith is right that Rebol isn't that close to natural
languages in this case) and I'm not even a native English speaker myself ;-)
But these similarities are what RT emphasizes aren't they?
Tom
