• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

BrianH
8-Mar-2013
[1624]
Pekr, unless this is a huge rehash that you don't want to repeat, 
could you let me know which View engine proposal you're talking about? 
I don't do GUI stuff so it's been a while since I caught up with 
current events. In the !R3-GUI group if that's appropriate.
Pekr
8-Mar-2013
[1625]
Haven't you seen Google Cyphre's post?
BrianH
8-Mar-2013
[1626x2]
We have 3 Brians I know of so far with different strengths. More 
would be welcome, of course :)
No, I haven't been following it. I haven't been in any Google groups 
in months.
Pekr
8-Mar-2013
[1628x2]
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rebol/6MMlv-E3j-E
well, IIRC Ladislav (or maybe someone other) posted the link few 
days ago here ....
BrianH
8-Mar-2013
[1630x2]
Ah, I was busy with other stuff then.
OK, so it's the R3 gob model with pluggable backend engines. Looks 
good to me.
Pekr
8-Mar-2013
[1632]
Yes, looks really good ....
DocKimbel
9-Mar-2013
[1633]
That's great Gregg, thanks!
DocKimbel
10-Mar-2013
[1634]
Kaj: it works now from command-line on Win7 and an icon for an hidden 
window appears in the task bar.
Arnold
10-Mar-2013
[1635]
Donated 15 EUR to Red.
DocKimbel
10-Mar-2013
[1636]
Great, thanks Arnold!
Kaj
10-Mar-2013
[1637x3]
Thanks, Doc. After fighting for a day and a night with the XP machine 
to keep it from self-destructing, I could test that audio playing 
also works on XP now - but no task bar icon...
I also confirmed Gregg's report that 0MQ works on XP; simply the 
one in my test repository
Apparently localhost networking doesn't work at all on XP if no real 
network card is installed
Maxim
11-Mar-2013
[1640]
IIRC you can install the virtual loopback adapter in order to allow 
tcp on a card-less machine on XP.
Kaj
11-Mar-2013
[1641]
Thanks, good to know
Gregg
11-Mar-2013
[1642]
Kaj, just a note to say I appreciate you always including reminders 
about where things are. I'm spread so thin these days that I easily 
lose track of old messages pointing to sources.
Kaj
11-Mar-2013
[1643]
Thanks. I have to, because people keep complaining they don't know 
where things are :-/
DocKimbel
14-Mar-2013
[1644]
Thank you Petr!
Gregg
14-Mar-2013
[1645]
Thanks Petr. Doc will tell me how much I owe him at the end of the 
month. :-)
james_nak
15-Mar-2013
[1646]
Thank you Ladislav.
Gregg
23-Mar-2013
[1647]
Go Kaj Go! The order of eval buttons confused me, as I haven't been 
on there in a while. Compare is great. That's what we need on a large 
scale.
Kaj
23-Mar-2013
[1648]
I've reordered it a bit in the modernisation, but if you hadn't been 
there for a while, it should be fresh :-)
Gregg
23-Mar-2013
[1649x2]
:-) I just expected all the DO buttons to be together, with help 
stuff on the right.
But that is such a minor nit to pick, that you should ignore it and 
just hear the part where I say "Go Kaj Go!". :-)
Kaj
23-Mar-2013
[1651x2]
No, you're right, it will be moved more. I left the help functions 
closest to the R3 button, because Red doesn't have those functions 
for now. I'll move them when Red gets them
On the other hand, the main Do button has always been first, on its 
own
Gregg
23-Mar-2013
[1653x2]
Ah, now that I click them--and remember--I get it. My gut said that 
Available Words would give me a matrix with the languages at the 
top and a list of words available in each.
e.g. col 1 would be a union of all available words, and each row 
would have a check if lang-x supports it.
Kaj
23-Mar-2013
[1655]
That would be very hard to accomplish, over all the different languages
Gregg
23-Mar-2013
[1656]
Well, I thought if anyone could do it... :-)
Kaj
23-Mar-2013
[1657]
I'll be pleased when we get it just for Red
Gregg
23-Mar-2013
[1658x2]
Just need a masert WORDS-OF reflector for each language. :-)
masert = master
Kaj
23-Mar-2013
[1660]
My objective is to move forward and spend as little effort as possible 
to be able to fight another day. So I must try to ignore the legacy 
languages as much as possible
Gregg
23-Mar-2013
[1661]
Understood. Keep fighting.
Kaj
23-Mar-2013
[1662]
Will do
Arnold
24-Mar-2013
[1663]
Well worth the wait. Excellent work Doc & contributors!!
DocKimbel
24-Mar-2013
[1664]
Thanks Arnold!
NickA
24-Mar-2013
[1665]
Doc, you're doing something very important.  Please keep up the great 
work!
DocKimbel
24-Mar-2013
[1666]
Thanks Nick. The good thing is that I'm not alone on this journey. 
:-)
Gregg
24-Mar-2013
[1667x3]
This is fantastic Doc. I know it's still very early days, but you 
are making great progress and it's very exciting to see it come to 
life. When I copied the commands from the new blog entry, to build 
the console, and it worked the first time, perfectly, it made my 
day. Then, even doing just simple things in the console was fun.
Of course, then I tried pasting the routine example from the blog, 
which didn't work. :-)
The most painful part of the whole thing? GitHub/Win.
DocKimbel
24-Mar-2013
[1670x2]
Routine are basically Red/System code which require a compilation 
step, so it can't run as-is in the interpreter.
But if you define a routine in a Red script, and then DO it, it will 
work. You can also build a custom console by writing a Red script 
and adding at the end an %include %<path-to>/console.red.
Gregg
24-Mar-2013
[1672]
Yes, I will read more carefully. Just too excited. :-)
DocKimbel
24-Mar-2013
[1673]
if you define a routine in a Red script, and then DO it, it will 
work.
 => the script needs to be compiled for that to work.