r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[!REBOL3 GUI]

Henrik
17-Sep-2011
[7259]
Tag field style:

http://rebol.hmkdesign.dk/files/r3/gui/257.png
Kaj
17-Sep-2011
[7260]
Is that just CHECK, or does it work differently?
Henrik
17-Sep-2011
[7261]
I think the intention is to emulate the MacOSX tag field. You write 
in a "floating" text field and when pressing enter, it becomes a 
tag, which can be deleted or moved around. Deleting or moving doesn't 
work yet.
GrahamC
17-Sep-2011
[7262]
looks like it removes the widget
Kaj
17-Sep-2011
[7263]
Ah, so you enter the text. Thanks
GrahamC
17-Sep-2011
[7264x3]
One thing I would like to see is the ability to keep focus on a field 
and not let it be lost to other faces/widgers appearing
without having to create a modal requester
or dialog
Henrik
17-Sep-2011
[7267]
noted. perhaps Bolek can answer if this is already possible (I'm 
already doing that in the VID Extension Kit).
GrahamC
17-Sep-2011
[7268]
In an async application you can't control which windows popup in 
the background ... so you want to keep focus on a field where you 
are entering data and not be kicked out of that field
Pekr
26-Sep-2011
[7269x2]
Taken from RMAsset Twitter: "We plan to release a new R3-GUI version 
next Friday." Any significant changes about tobe expected, in comparison 
to latest release?
If I understand it correctly, your NLPP app, version 2.0, is going 
to be done in R3, hence using R3 GUI?
Henrik
26-Sep-2011
[7271]
NLPP 2.0 is R2 and RebGUI based.
Pekr
26-Sep-2011
[7272]
ok, thanks ... Ithought that R3 GUI is suited for that task, but 
that would be probably a preliminary assumption :-)
Henrik
26-Sep-2011
[7273x2]
The timing is bad, as NLPP 2.0 has already been in development since 
early 2011 and it's almost leaving alpha development. Furthermore, 
there is a lot of development time invested in some special RebGUI 
widgets for NLPP and converting this work to R3 would take a significant 
amount of time.
That time is better invested in allowing people to work on specific 
things, like the automated testing system for the R3 GUI, rather 
than specialize ourselves into a corner this early.
GrahamC
26-Sep-2011
[7275]
Are the RebGUI widgets being released?
Henrik
26-Sep-2011
[7276]
Not sure, as the usefulness is probably limited outside NLPP.
GrahamC
30-Sep-2011
[7277]
Thanks for the new release.
Robert
2-Oct-2011
[7278x2]
With our R3-GUI test-system available now, we could really need some 
help in creating test-cases. The more the better. We want to build-up 
a huge test-suite for GUI tests that we run on "every commit" to 
keep quality high and identify breaking changes.
The more help to build test-cases and submit them to us, the faster 
we will be in pushing R3-GUI forward.
Pekr
2-Oct-2011
[7280]
I can still get hard crasches of R3, in various phases:

do %r3-gui.r3
do %examples/run-layouts.r3


Two times I got a crash, when just closing the windows, and when 
at layout #15, clicking in the form. Once I got it with layout #20, 
and once at layout #27, clicking the big red button ...
Henrik
2-Oct-2011
[7281]
Pekr, if you can post directly what you do, that would be helpful, 
so Bolek can solve cases, one at a time.
Pekr
2-Oct-2011
[7282]
I just posted what I do. Running above script, closing the windows, 
and trying to click into some forms. Not easily reproducible ...
Henrik
2-Oct-2011
[7283]
ok. anything reproducible helps.
Cyphre
3-Oct-2011
[7284]
Pekr, the 'hard crashes' are most probably related to one bug that 
is waiting on Carl to trace/fix since it looks we are not able to 
do it from the host-kit side.
Pekr
3-Oct-2011
[7285]
Cyphre - is there any chance Carl is going to be available to do 
some low-level fixes? It kind of crashes very often, but of course, 
with one specific use-case, so "normal GUI usage" (whatever that 
means) could be without any problems ...
Robert
3-Oct-2011
[7286]
We are in contact with him, but as you know this can than still take 
some time.
Pekr
3-Oct-2011
[7287x3]
Cool that he's available. I noticed his new photo on a vineyard, 
on facebook, so he's still alive and well :-)
Our next focus is on the skinning system. We finally want to have 
the most beautiful R3 apps on the planet :-)
 - your Twitter message is very welcomed :-)
Does it mean, that material system is in-place, or was it simplified? 
What is the state re skinning? From what I understand, Henrik had 
no free time to work on it last I checked?
Henrik
3-Oct-2011
[7290]
Need the facilities for skinning to be in place first, so it will 
be a while.
Claude
4-Oct-2011
[7291]
great release ;-) thank you. perhaps ask carl to do somethink for 
gui on linux
Pekr
7-Oct-2011
[7292]
As for the possible "look & feel" of the GUI, I personally like HTC 
Sense, and Linux Mint - combination of light greay and green. IIRC 
Ashley created some more lightweight look for his GUI too later in 
the process ...


http://www.xda-developers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ScreenShots.png?139d23

http://smartphoneblogging.com/android-picture-galleries/htc-sense-screenshots/
http://www.linuxmint.com/screenshots.php

Take it just as a note :-)
Robert
7-Oct-2011
[7293x2]
Anyone going to help developing styles? We need more of them.
The base is now matured enough that all can help.
Pekr
7-Oct-2011
[7295]
Robert - so the infrastructure for skinning will be added later?
Robert
7-Oct-2011
[7296]
We are already working on it. But it doesn't impact the style writer. 
You can add a nice look later.
Robert
8-Oct-2011
[7297x2]
Is anyone willing to try to develop a tree style?
We don't have it on our plan at the moment, but it's a fundamental 
style so this would fit good with the styles we do.
Robert
11-Oct-2011
[7299]
So, I see no one is really interested in this R3 GUI stuff... I'm 
wondering a bit but anyway... I think doing public releases might 
not be worth the effort.
Pekr
11-Oct-2011
[7300x2]
Robert - I think that it is not accurate, that noone is interested 
in the R3 GUI. IMO we all are, it is just that each of us is busy 
elsewhere. If you look into the past of this group, or in the old 
GUI (Carl's one) old days, it was mostly me and 1-2 users to do some 
comments, studying code, etc. It is about the general lack of man-power. 
E.g. shadwolf claimed, he can do tree view in few hours, but is refusing 
to, and you better don't read the long blog chat. It is also about 
lost confidence of many rebollers into R3 in general. Or just maybe 
- ppl being in wait mode, untill Carl reappears?
As for me - "I would like to help", and I will at some point, at 
least with testing. But got my own project 2Zone moving, awaiting 
LED Screen arrival and needing to do many arrangements. I can't surely 
code tree-view,but I can test, even privately, for anyone who asks 
me. Not much next 3-5 weeks though ....
Endo
11-Oct-2011
[7302]
Robert: you are wrong.  As Pekr said many of us are waiting and busy 
with something else. I downloaded all the RMA R3 stuff, tested all 
GUI examples (found some crash problems btw) I really would like 
to help/write a tree style, but I'm not a good Rebol coder I'm afraid.
So please keep up the work.
Sunanda
11-Oct-2011
[7303]
Robert -- an R3 GUI just isn't one of my priorities just now.


While  there is no likely target date for a beta release of R3, all 
my REBOL development is on R2.


I was happy to help debug R3 alphas while that project had some momentum, 
and I may be again in the future, But right now, I just do not have 
the time for what I have to consider to be speculative projects.

I hope you do get the help and feedback you need.
james_nak
11-Oct-2011
[7304]
Robert, I am in the same boat working on an R2 application when I 
get the time to even work on that. I do understand your frustration 
though after listening to all the concern.  As Endo said, please 
keep up the good work.
BrianH
11-Oct-2011
[7305]
I will be more actively interested when I start having to write code 
that requires any GUI at all, but what I'm working on right now doesn't 
even need a web interface. All batch and server stuff, and almost 
all the REBOL stuff is R3. This can't last forever, so I will eventually 
need a GUI. I am working on ODBC though.
Robert
12-Oct-2011
[7306x2]
Well, we all have a hell lot to do. There are just a some simple 
facts:


- making public releases cost us time. Not horrible lot but anyway...

- people are interested to take a look at the code and run the tests...
- maybe we get some feedback

All nice, but it doesn't move us forward faster.


I'm not frustrated I'm just wondering.... there are still a lot of 
excuses why R3 can't be used (which is wrong) but only a very few 
people try to build something with it.
Anyway... we continue with our development but public releases will 
have lower priority. We are using our stuff to build some small tools, 
we will publish. Than you might take a look what's possible.
Pekr
12-Oct-2011
[7308]
Well, that contradicts a bit expectation, that RMA's GUI is RT's 
officially endorsed GUI to be bundled with R3. OTOH there are no 
official R3 releases anyway, so ....