r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Linux] group for linux REBOL users

Joe
30-Oct-2005
[294]
the terminal server is used by the hosting company to access multiple 
servers consoles without having physical consoles. When they reboot 
a machine the can get the bios boot messages because there is a console 
cable to the terminal server and they normally access the terminal 
server via ssh
Alan
30-Oct-2005
[295]
ok I am running into a problem running the last stable version on 
View-I can run as root but not a user ? running from root i have 
changed the permissions but when I do that,then I can not run a root 
? I remember on mandrake 10.1 I was able to run View as a user ? 
Also,what do I need to install to get the View 1.3 ? running on mandriva 
2006 ? Thanks from a Linux newbie
DideC
8-Nov-2005
[296x2]
Is there any specific need to make View 1.3.50 running under Linux:
- It runs right while clicking the icon
- it fails to run from a terminal:
	./rebol
	** User Error: REBOL: Cannot connect to X server
	** Near: size-text self
Is there some environment vars missing ?
Pekr
8-Nov-2005
[298x2]
you cant run View in console mode?
I mean - if your server does not have X-Win installed, then you have 
to use Core
DideC
8-Nov-2005
[300]
(Its not me, but I asked for another guy)
An "xhost + localhost" seems to have solved the problem.
Henrik
22-Nov-2005
[301]
hmm... after upgrading to Ubuntu Dapper, AltME has started working 
again.
Kaj
23-Nov-2005
[302]
Thanks for that info!
Rebolek
23-Nov-2005
[303]
which distro do you recommend to linux newbie (me)?
Henrik
23-Nov-2005
[304]
Ubuntu is very nice for beginners
Volker
23-Nov-2005
[305]
Is it very different from knoppix? HAs knoppix stiil the better hardware-detection? 
Than 1-2weeks knoppix and thenubuntu?
Henrik
23-Nov-2005
[306]
I can only speak for myself, but Ubuntu installed flawlessly on the 
PC's I've installed it on. I use Knoppix only as a live CD.
Kaj
23-Nov-2005
[307]
Knoppix still has better detection, but yes, it's primarily a live 
CD. I use Ubuntu in most cases, but I use MEPIS instead of Knoppix, 
which is also very nice and can both be installed and used as a live 
CD, like Ubuntu
Volker
23-Nov-2005
[308x2]
AFAIK knoppix is now debian-compatible, means apt-get works without 
problems.
But if ubuntu installs without problems, its ok.
Rebolek
23-Nov-2005
[310]
I've installed Ubuntu for my girlfriend and it seems to work without 
problems. My win-comp crashed badly again so I'm thinging about changing 
my OS. I want to know what alternatives are there, what distro seems 
to work best. I tried Mepis yesterday but was dissapointed, it had 
some strange problems.
Luisc
23-Nov-2005
[311]
easy to use =  Xandros, linspire, mepis, pcbsd. I personally use 
linspire ( the only one that finds all my hardware and it works), 
mepis is real nice but it won't detect my 4 port lan ( only 2 ports) 
Xandros crashes with my video card, pcbsd ( freebsd) is very nice 
but right know it has issues with flat monitors, Oh Oh you can try 
PClinuxOS it is easy too and with a lot of eye candy.
Alan
23-Nov-2005
[312]
well my fav is still Mandriva-works out of the door and is the only 
distro that worked under Vmware.tried both ubuntu
Oldes
24-Nov-2005
[313x2]
Is there someone using Mandriva Linux?
ach see Alan:))
Christophe
24-Nov-2005
[315]
Yes Oldes, I do. Mandriva 10.2
Terry
24-Nov-2005
[316x4]
Damn Small Linux 2.0 released..  http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/index.html


Damn Small is small enough and smart enough to do the following things:


    * Boot from a business card CD as a live linux distribution (LiveCD)
    * Boot from a USB pen drive

    * Boot from within a host operating system (that's right, it can 
    run *inside* Windows)

    * Run very nicely from an IDE Compact Flash drive via a method we 
    call "frugal install"

    * Transform into a Debian OS with a traditional hard drive install
    * Run light enough to power a 486DX with 16MB of Ram

    * Run fully in RAM with as little as 128MB (you will be amazed at 
    how fast your computer can be!)

    * Modularly grow -- DSL is highly extendable without the need to 
    customize
screen shots  http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/dsl-fb.2.0.jpghttp://www.damnsmalllinux.org/dsl-jwm.2.0.jpg
50mb and includes.. 


XMMS (MP3, CD Music, and MPEG), FTP client, Dillo web browser, links 
web browser, FireFox, spreadsheet, Sylpheed email, spellcheck (US 
English), a word-processor (FLwriter), three editors (Beaver, Vim, 
and Nano [Pico clone]), graphics editing and viewing (Xpaint, and 
xzgv), Xpdf (PDF Viewer), emelFM (file manager), Naim (AIM, ICQ, 
IRC), VNCviwer, Rdesktop, SSH/SCP server and client, DHCP client, 
PPP, PPPoE (ADSL), a web server, calculator, generic and GhostScript 
printer support, NFS, Fluxbox window manager, games, system monitoring 
apps, a host of command line tools, USB support, and pcmcia support, 
some wireless support.
There's 1 mb left .. should talk to them about adding /View
Ammon
24-Nov-2005
[320]
Yes, but does it run REBOL? ;->
Volker
24-Nov-2005
[321x2]
:)
View as big as .net BUT including os?
Henrik
24-Nov-2005
[323]
or remove all the other junk and put just REBOL on top of the kernel...
Terry
24-Nov-2005
[324]
Well, I wouldn't call it 'junk'
Volker
24-Nov-2005
[325]
Agreed. Think open source rebol linked in each of them :)
Henrik
24-Nov-2005
[326]
ok, sorry, not junk :-) but think of what you could do with REBOL 
in the same amount of diskspace
Terry
24-Nov-2005
[327]
Add it to the long awaited Nano-ITX http://www.mini-itx.com/
Alan
24-Nov-2005
[328]
and suse on Vmware and only mandriva could coonect to the net/play 
mp3s and other important stuff PLUS Rebol -  Altme
Pekr
5-Dec-2005
[329]
has anyone any experience, of how to configure 'sendmail, to allow 
sending email from various domains? I run cgi script, I want to send 
email from particular domain (virtual host on my server - I host 
several domains), but it always goes away as one concrete domain. 
I have suspiccion I should somehow turn off email masquarading, but 
dunno how :-)
Gabriele
6-Dec-2005
[330]
if the user sending the email (usually "apache" or "httpd" if you're 
on CGI) is in the trusted users list for sendmail, it will accept 
whatever you put in the From: header. are you calling sendmail directly 
to send the email?
Kaj
11-Dec-2005
[331]
Petr, if at all possible, use Postfix instead of Sendmail. Sendmail 
is horrible
Chris
11-Dec-2005
[332x3]
get-modes %vanila.r [owner-name]
Sorry, composing a question over VNC...
Really slow, which is odd because the target is a 'clean' WinXP install, 
where my old, upgraded-from-WinME XP install was much faster.  Anyway, 
inappropriate for the Linux group, I know.
Graham
27-Jan-2006
[335x2]
Any suggestions on a better 'browse definition for Linux?
Volker is suggesting this:

escape-metachars: func["escape metachars" s][
 replace/all s "'" "''"
 rejoin ["'" s "'"]
]

browse: func[url]compose/deep[

call rejoin ["screen -X screen -- " (view-root/bin/browser.sh) " 
" escape-metachars url]
]
Robert
25-Feb-2006
[337]
Trying to update my rebol installation on my red-hat 7.2 box. (Yes, 
it's old I know but it works without any problems). The new rebol 
stuff require a different glib_c version. How do I update this on 
my RH box?
Geomol
25-Feb-2006
[338x2]
Robert, you may find the right glibc rpm here: http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/index.html

Be sure to read about the different ones, so you get the right one.

You should be able to have more than one version of glibc installed 
at the same time (so everything will work). There are programs with 
GUIs in RedHat Linux to install rpms, or you can use the rpm command 
from the command line.

It's been a while, since I used Linux, and it can be a hazzle to 
update sometimes.
Oh, it's spelled "hassle".
Sunanda
25-Feb-2006
[340]
hazzle would a good portmanteau word combing hassle and hazzard :-)
Robert
25-Feb-2006
[341x3]
Geomol, thanks a lot.
Hm... ok got the RPMs but how to install several glibc parallel?
There exists no how-to for installing two version of glibc. I can't 
believe this. Haven't the Linux guys though about installing several 
different versions? Sounds like the MS-DLL-hell problem to me. Not 
a bit better than...